[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6] X86/MCE: update vMCE injection for AMD
Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 26.09.12 at 05:11, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I fold patch 6 to patch 2, will send out later. > > As I had indicated, I had done this already in preparation of things > getting committed, so you will want to check once in staging > (hopefully later today). > > Jan Got it, thanks! It's OK to me, but how about add sanity check and some comments like ================== Xen/MCE: add sanity check and comments for vmce injection Add sanity check for input vcpu so that malicious value would not return 0. Add comments since vcpu<0 (broadcast) is some implicit to code reader. Signed-off-by: Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> diff -r adc7f057011e xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c Thu Sep 27 19:52:13 2012 +0800 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c Thu Sep 27 20:56:52 2012 +0800 @@ -341,10 +341,16 @@ /* * for Intel MCE, broadcast vMCE to all vcpus * for AMD MCE, only inject vMCE to vcpu0 + * + * @ d, domain to which would inject vmce + * @ vcpu, + * < 0, broadcast vMCE to all vcpus + * >= 0, vcpu who would be injected vMCE */ int inject_vmce(struct domain *d, int vcpu) { struct vcpu *v; + int ret = -EINVAL; for_each_vcpu ( d, v ) { @@ -358,19 +364,21 @@ mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: inject vMCE to d%d:v%d\n", d->domain_id, v->vcpu_id); vcpu_kick(v); + ret = 0; } else { mce_printk(MCE_QUIET, "Failed to inject vMCE to d%d:v%d\n", d->domain_id, v->vcpu_id); - return -EBUSY; + ret = -EBUSY; + break; } if ( vcpu >= 0 ) - return 0; + break; } - return v ? -ESRCH : 0; + return ret; } int fill_vmsr_data(struct mcinfo_bank *mc_bank, struct domain *d, Attachment:
vmce_injection_update.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |