Re: [Xen-devel] Xen4.2 S3 regression?

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 24.09.12 at 16:16, Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Would you prefer a separate [PATCH] email for this fix, or will you apply
> it as-is?

I'll put something together - the most important thing here obviously
is having a proper description. Plus I'd like to slightly extend this and
have acpi_dead_idle() actually use default_dead_idle(), just to have
things consolidated in one place. I assume I can put your S-o-b on
what you sent...

Jan

> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> >>> On 24.09.12 at 15:56, Ben Guthro <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> ...; the interesting ones are
>> >> - at the end of xen/arch/x86/acpu/cpu_idle.c:acpi_dead_idle()
>> >> - xen/arch/x86/domain.c:default_dead_idle()
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks! This fixes the issue on this machine!
>>
>> Hooray!
>>
>> > Is this a reasonable long-term solution - or are there reasons not to
>> > call wbinvd() here?
>>
>> That's a perfectly valid adjustment (see my earlier reply where
>> I originally suggested it and explained why it may be necessary).
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel