|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 2/8]: PVH mmu changes
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:55:31PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> There are few code style issues on this patch, I suggest you run it
> through scripts/checkpatch.pl, it should be able to catch all these
> errors.
>
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > ---
> > arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 180
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > arch/x86/xen/mmu.h | 2 +
> > include/xen/xen-ops.h | 12 +++-
> > 3 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > index b65a761..9b5a5ef 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
> > #include <xen/interface/version.h>
> > #include <xen/interface/memory.h>
> > #include <xen/hvc-console.h>
> > +#include <xen/balloon.h>
> >
> > #include "multicalls.h"
> > #include "mmu.h"
> > @@ -330,6 +331,26 @@ static void xen_set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
> > __xen_set_pte(ptep, pteval);
> > }
> >
> > +void xen_set_clr_mmio_pvh_pte(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long mfn,
> > + int nr_mfns, int add_mapping)
> > +{
> > + struct physdev_map_iomem iomem;
> > +
> > + iomem.first_gfn = pfn;
> > + iomem.first_mfn = mfn;
> > + iomem.nr_mfns = nr_mfns;
> > + iomem.add_mapping = add_mapping;
> > +
> > + if (HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_pvh_map_iomem, &iomem))
> > + BUG();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void xen_dom0pvh_set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long
> > addr,
> > + pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
> > +{
> > + native_set_pte(ptep, pteval);
> > +}
>
> can't you just set set_pte_at to native_set_pte?
>
>
> > static void xen_set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > pte_t *ptep, pte_t pteval)
> > {
> > @@ -1197,6 +1218,10 @@ static void xen_post_allocator_init(void);
> > static void __init xen_pagetable_setup_done(pgd_t *base)
> > {
> > xen_setup_shared_info();
> > +
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return;
> > +
> > xen_post_allocator_init();
> > }
>
> Can we move the if..return at the beginning of xen_post_allocator_init?
> It would make it easier to understand what it is for.
> Or maybe we could have xen_setup_shared_info take a pgd_t *base
> parameter so that you can set pagetable_setup_done to
> xen_setup_shared_info directly on pvh.
It actually ends up nicely aligning with my patches since I end up
using 'if (xen_feature(..)'. But you can't see that since these patches
are not rebased on that - which is OK.
>
>
> > @@ -1455,6 +1480,10 @@ static void __init xen_set_pte_init(pte_t *ptep,
> > pte_t pte)
> > static void pin_pagetable_pfn(unsigned cmd, unsigned long pfn)
> > {
> > struct mmuext_op op;
> > +
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_writable_page_tables))
> > + return;
> > +
> > op.cmd = cmd;
> > op.arg1.mfn = pfn_to_mfn(pfn);
> > if (HYPERVISOR_mmuext_op(&op, 1, NULL, DOMID_SELF))
>
> given the very limited set of mmu pvops that we initialize on pvh, I
> cannot find who would actually call pin_pagetable_pfn on pvh.
>
>
> > @@ -1652,6 +1681,10 @@ static void set_page_prot(void *addr, pgprot_t prot)
> > unsigned long pfn = __pa(addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > pte_t pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
> >
> > + /* recall for PVH, page tables are native. */
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return;
> > +
> > if (HYPERVISOR_update_va_mapping((unsigned long)addr, pte, 0))
> > BUG();
> > }
> > @@ -1729,6 +1762,9 @@ static void convert_pfn_mfn(void *v)
> > pte_t *pte = v;
> > int i;
> >
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return;
> > +
> > /* All levels are converted the same way, so just treat them
> > as ptes. */
> > for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++)
> > @@ -1745,6 +1781,7 @@ static void convert_pfn_mfn(void *v)
> > * but that's enough to get __va working. We need to fill in the rest
> > * of the physical mapping once some sort of allocator has been set
> > * up.
> > + * NOTE: for PVH, the page tables are native.
> > */
> > pgd_t * __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd,
> > unsigned long max_pfn)
> > @@ -1802,9 +1839,13 @@ pgd_t * __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd,
> > * structure to attach it to, so make sure we just set kernel
> > * pgd.
> > */
> > - xen_mc_batch();
> > - __xen_write_cr3(true, __pa(pgd));
> > - xen_mc_issue(PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU);
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_writable_page_tables)) {
> > + native_write_cr3(__pa(pgd));
> > + } else {
> > + xen_mc_batch();
> > + __xen_write_cr3(true, __pa(pgd));
> > + xen_mc_issue(PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU);
> > + }
> >
> > memblock_reserve(__pa(xen_start_info->pt_base),
> > xen_start_info->nr_pt_frames * PAGE_SIZE);
> > @@ -2067,9 +2108,21 @@ static const struct pv_mmu_ops xen_mmu_ops
> > __initconst = {
> >
> > void __init xen_init_mmu_ops(void)
> > {
> > + x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done = xen_pagetable_setup_done;
> > +
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap)) {
> > + pv_mmu_ops.flush_tlb_others = xen_flush_tlb_others;
> > +
> > + /* set_pte* for PCI devices to map iomem. */
> > + if (xen_initial_domain()) {
> > + pv_mmu_ops.set_pte = native_set_pte;
> > + pv_mmu_ops.set_pte_at = xen_dom0pvh_set_pte_at;
> > + }
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > x86_init.mapping.pagetable_reserve = xen_mapping_pagetable_reserve;
> > x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start = xen_pagetable_setup_start;
> > - x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done = xen_pagetable_setup_done;
> > pv_mmu_ops = xen_mmu_ops;
> >
> > memset(dummy_mapping, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>
> I wonder whether it would make sense to have a xen_pvh_init_mmu_ops,
> given that they end up being so different...
>
>
> > @@ -2305,6 +2358,92 @@ void __init xen_hvm_init_mmu_ops(void)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +/* Map foreign gmfn, fgmfn, to local pfn, lpfn. This for the user space
> > + * creating new guest on PVH dom0 and needs to map domU pages.
> > + */
> > +static int pvh_add_to_xen_p2m(unsigned long lpfn, unsigned long fgmfn,
> > + unsigned int domid)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > + struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp = { .u.foreign_domid = domid };
> > +
> > + xatp.gpfn = lpfn;
> > + xatp.idx = fgmfn;
> > + xatp.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> > + xatp.space = XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign;
> > + rc = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_add_to_physmap, &xatp);
> > + if (rc)
> > + pr_warn("d0: Failed to map pfn to mfn rc:%d pfn:%lx mfn:%lx\n",
> > + rc, lpfn, fgmfn);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int pvh_rem_xen_p2m(unsigned long spfn, int count)
> > +{
> > + struct xen_remove_from_physmap xrp;
> > + int i, rc;
> > +
> > + for (i=0; i < count; i++) {
> > + xrp.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> > + xrp.gpfn = spfn+i;
> > + rc = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_remove_from_physmap, &xrp);
> > + if (rc) {
> > + pr_warn("Failed to unmap pfn:%lx rc:%d done:%d\n",
> > + spfn+i, rc, i);
> > + return 1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pvh_rem_xen_p2m);
> > +
> > +struct pvh_remap_data {
> > + unsigned long fgmfn; /* foreign domain's gmfn */
> > + pgprot_t prot;
> > + domid_t domid;
> > + struct xen_pvh_pfn_info *pvhinfop;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int pvh_map_pte_fn(pte_t *ptep, pgtable_t token, unsigned long
> > addr,
> > + void *data)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > + struct pvh_remap_data *remapp = data;
> > + struct xen_pvh_pfn_info *pvhp = remapp->pvhinfop;
> > + unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(pvhp->pi_paga[pvhp->pi_next_todo++]);
> > + pte_t pteval = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(pfn, remapp->prot));
> > +
> > + if ((rc=pvh_add_to_xen_p2m(pfn, remapp->fgmfn, remapp->domid)))
> > + return rc;
> > + native_set_pte(ptep, pteval);
>
> Do we actually need the pte to be "special"?
> I would think that being in the guest p2m, it is actually quite a normal
> page.
>
>
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* The only caller at moment passes one gmfn at a time.
> > + * PVH TBD/FIXME: expand this in future to honor batch requests.
> > + */
> > +static int pvh_remap_gmfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long addr, unsigned long mfn, int nr,
> > + pgprot_t prot, unsigned domid,
> > + struct xen_pvh_pfn_info *pvhp)
> > +{
> > + int err;
> > + struct pvh_remap_data pvhdata;
> > +
> > + if (nr > 1)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + pvhdata.fgmfn = mfn;
> > + pvhdata.prot = prot;
> > + pvhdata.domid = domid;
> > + pvhdata.pvhinfop = pvhp;
> > + err = apply_to_page_range(vma->vm_mm, addr, nr << PAGE_SHIFT,
> > + pvh_map_pte_fn, &pvhdata);
> > + flush_tlb_all();
>
> Maybe we can use one of the flush_tlb_range varieties instead of a
> flush_tlb_all?
>
>
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > #define REMAP_BATCH_SIZE 16
> >
> > struct remap_data {
> > @@ -2329,7 +2468,9 @@ static int remap_area_mfn_pte_fn(pte_t *ptep,
> > pgtable_t token,
> > int xen_remap_domain_mfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long addr,
> > unsigned long mfn, int nr,
> > - pgprot_t prot, unsigned domid)
> > + pgprot_t prot, unsigned domid,
> > + struct xen_pvh_pfn_info *pvhp)
> > +
> > {
> > struct remap_data rmd;
> > struct mmu_update mmu_update[REMAP_BATCH_SIZE];
> > @@ -2342,6 +2483,12 @@ int xen_remap_domain_mfn_range(struct vm_area_struct
> > *vma,
> > BUG_ON(!((vma->vm_flags & (VM_PFNMAP | VM_RESERVED | VM_IO)) ==
> > (VM_PFNMAP | VM_RESERVED | VM_IO)));
> >
> > + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap)) {
> > + /* We need to update the local page tables and the xen HAP */
> > + return pvh_remap_gmfn_range(vma, addr, mfn, nr, prot, domid,
> > + pvhp);
> > + }
> > +
> > rmd.mfn = mfn;
> > rmd.prot = prot;
> >
> > @@ -2371,3 +2518,26 @@ out:
> > return err;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_remap_domain_mfn_range);
> > +
> > +/* Returns: Number of pages unmapped */
> > +int xen_unmap_domain_mfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + struct xen_pvh_pfn_info *pvhp)
> > +{
> > + int count = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!pvhp || !xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + while (pvhp->pi_next_todo--) {
> > + unsigned long pfn;
> > +
> > + /* the mmu has already cleaned up the process mmu resources at
> > + * this point (lookup_address will return NULL). */
> > + pfn = page_to_pfn(pvhp->pi_paga[pvhp->pi_next_todo]);
> > + pvh_rem_xen_p2m(pfn, 1);
> > + count++;
> > + }
> > + flush_tlb_all();
> > + return count;
>
> Who is going to remove the corresponding mapping from the vma?
> Also we might be able to replace the flush_tlb_all with a
> flush_tlb_range.
>
>
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_unmap_domain_mfn_range);
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.h b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.h
> > index 73809bb..6d0bb56 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.h
> > @@ -23,4 +23,6 @@ unsigned long xen_read_cr2_direct(void);
> >
> > extern void xen_init_mmu_ops(void);
> > extern void xen_hvm_init_mmu_ops(void);
> > +extern void xen_set_clr_mmio_pvh_pte(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long mfn,
> > + int nr_mfns, int add_mapping);
> > #endif /* _XEN_MMU_H */
> > diff --git a/include/xen/xen-ops.h b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
> > index 6a198e4..6c5ad83 100644
> > --- a/include/xen/xen-ops.h
> > +++ b/include/xen/xen-ops.h
> > @@ -24,9 +24,19 @@ int xen_create_contiguous_region(unsigned long vstart,
> > unsigned int order,
> > void xen_destroy_contiguous_region(unsigned long vstart, unsigned int
> > order);
> >
> > struct vm_area_struct;
> > +struct xen_pvh_pfn_info;
> > int xen_remap_domain_mfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long addr,
> > unsigned long mfn, int nr,
> > - pgprot_t prot, unsigned domid);
> > + pgprot_t prot, unsigned domid,
> > + struct xen_pvh_pfn_info *pvhp);
> > +int xen_unmap_domain_mfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + struct xen_pvh_pfn_info *pvhp);
> > +
> > +struct xen_pvh_pfn_info {
> > + struct page **pi_paga; /* pfn info page array */
> > + int pi_num_pgs;
> > + int pi_next_todo;
> > +};
> >
> > #endif /* INCLUDE_XEN_OPS_H */
> > --
> > 1.7.2.3
> >
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |