|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] error when pass through device to guest with qemu-xen-dir-remote
Anthony PERARD wrote on 2012-09-19:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Zhang, Yang Z <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Anthony PERARD wrote on 2012-09-18:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So, we'll have to add a check in the unplug code of qemu to ignore
>>> passthrough devices.
>>>
>>> Here is a patches, I did not test it.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/xen_platform.c b/hw/xen_platform.c
>>> index 0d6c2ff..2d3978e 100644
>>> --- a/hw/xen_platform.c
>>> +++ b/hw/xen_platform.c
>>> @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ static void log_writeb ...
>>>
>>> static void unplug_nic(PCIBus *b, PCIDevice *d, void *o)
>>> {
>>> + /* We have to ignore passthrough devices */
>>> if (pci_get_word(d->config + PCI_CLASS_DEVICE) ==
>>> - PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET) {
>>> + PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET
>>> + && strcmp(d->name, "xen-pci-passthrough") != 0) {
>>> qdev_free(&d->qdev);
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> In old qemu, we will free the invalid NIC through this function. And it will
>> fail w/
> your change. Shouldn't we follow the old logic?
>
> I don't understand. Are you arguing this patch or the function it self?
>
> My change is fine and follow the old logic: do not do anything for a
> passthrough device.
No. Old logic will unplug the passthrough device which mask as invalid. And
this patch just ignores all passthrough device.
I wonder whether this change will impact other part? If not, it should be ok.
> I now have tested the change, and QEMU work as espected, it will
> unplug the emulated NIC, and ignore any passthrough devices. So the
> guest can the passthroughed NIC.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Anthony PERARD
Best regards,
Yang
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |