Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/6] xen: improve changes to xen_add_to_physmap

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:59:47 +0100
> Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:08 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > This is an incremental patch on top of
> > > c0bc926083b5987a3e9944eec2c12ad0580100e2: in order to retain binary
> > > compatibility, it is better to introduce foreign_domid as part of a
> > > union containing both size and foreign_domid.
> > [...]
> > > -    domid_t foreign_domid; /* IFF gmfn_foreign */
> > > +    unsigned int space;
> > >  
> > >  #define XENMAPIDX_grant_table_status 0x80000000
> > 
> > Was this the final consensus on what this interface ought to look
> > like?
> > 
> > Does it work for PVH too (Mukesh CCd)?
> 
> Yes it does. Please lmk if the final version asap so I can put in
> my patch, and also test it.

It the final version. I think it should go in, unless we want to drop it
entirely in favor of xen_add_to_physmap_range.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel