[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/10] xen/swiotlb: Depending on after_bootmem is not correct.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > When PCI IOMMUs are initialized it is after after_bootmem but > before a lot of "other" subsystems are initialized. As such > the check for after_bootmem is incorrect and we should > just use a parameter to define whether we are early or late. > > This solves this bootup problem: > > __ex_table already sorted, skipping sortM > Initializing CPU#0 > Warning: only able to allocate 1 MB for software IO TLB > Xen-SWIOTLB: Lowering to 2MB > Warning: only able to allocate 1 MB for software IO TLB > Xen-SWIOTLB: Lowering to 2MB > Warning: only able to allocate 1 MB for software IO TLB > Xen-SWIOTLB: Lowering to 2MB > Warning: only able to allocate 1 MB for software IO TLB > Cannot allocate Xen-SWIOTLB buffer (rc:-12) > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 11 ++++++----- > include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c b/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c > index fc0c78f..1608244 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/pci-swiotlb-xen.c > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ int __init pci_xen_swiotlb_detect(void) > void __init pci_xen_swiotlb_init(void) > { > if (xen_swiotlb) { > - xen_swiotlb_init(1); > + xen_swiotlb_init(1, true /* early */); > dma_ops = &xen_swiotlb_dma_ops; > > /* Make sure ACS will be enabled */ > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ int pci_xen_swiotlb_init_late(void) > if (xen_swiotlb) > return 0; > > - rc = xen_swiotlb_init(1); > + rc = xen_swiotlb_init(1, false /* late */); > if (rc) > return rc; > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c > index 6f81994..7443e19 100644 > --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c > +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c > @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static const char *xen_swiotlb_error(enum xen_swiotlb_err > err) > } > return ""; > } > -int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose) > +int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early) > { > unsigned long bytes, order; > int rc = -ENOMEM; > @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ retry: > /* > * Get IO TLB memory from any location. > */ > - if (!after_bootmem) > + if (early) > xen_io_tlb_start = alloc_bootmem_pages(PAGE_ALIGN(bytes)); > else { > #define SLABS_PER_PAGE (1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - IO_TLB_SHIFT)) > @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ retry: > bytes, > xen_io_tlb_nslabs); > if (rc) { > - if (!after_bootmem) > + if (early) > free_bootmem(__pa(xen_io_tlb_start), PAGE_ALIGN(bytes)); > else { > free_pages((unsigned long)xen_io_tlb_start, order); > @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ retry: > goto error; > } > start_dma_addr = xen_virt_to_bus(xen_io_tlb_start); > - if (!after_bootmem) > + rc = 0; ^ why does this change belong to this patch? > + if (early) > swiotlb_init_with_tbl(xen_io_tlb_start, xen_io_tlb_nslabs, > verbose); > else > rc = swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl(xen_io_tlb_start, > xen_io_tlb_nslabs); > @@ -244,7 +245,7 @@ error: > goto retry; > } > pr_err("%s (rc:%d)", xen_swiotlb_error(m_ret), rc); > - if (!after_bootmem) > + if (early) > panic("%s (rc:%d)", xen_swiotlb_error(m_ret), rc); > else > free_pages((unsigned long)xen_io_tlb_start, order); > diff --git a/include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h b/include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h > index a0db2b7..de8bcc6 100644 > --- a/include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h > +++ b/include/xen/swiotlb-xen.h > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > > #include <linux/swiotlb.h> > > -extern int xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose); > +extern int xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early); > > extern void > *xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size, > -- > 1.7.7.6 > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |