Re: [Xen-devel] Clang/LLVM version requirements

[Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>]

At 08:58 -0700 on 07 Sep (1347008330), Jeffrey Karrels wrote:
> > Looks like the clang build has bitrotted a little - sorry.  It's too
> > late to fix this for 4.2 now but we can sort it out after we branch
> > (i.e. next week) and backport any build fixes for 4.2.1.
> >
> 
> No worries. I can try and help out on this. Do you think it is
> worthwhile to start a Wiki page for this type of work.

Yes, I think so.  Lars Kurth can sort you out with whatever
accounts/permissions you need.

> I was working with cppcheck, sparse, clang on/for xen...

That all sounds great.  I'm in favour of any more analysis we can get,
at least if it doesn't need intrusive annotations.

At 11:43 -0700 on 11 Sep (1347363829), Jeffrey Karrels wrote:
> Just to keep the knowledge in the collective... I updated my clang and
> llvm to the latest trunk:
> 
> [builder@xenbuild1 xen-unstable]$ /usr/local/bin/clang -v
> clang version 3.2 (trunk 163631)
> Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> Thread model: posix
> 
> After that I applied the patch that Tim previously posted and tried
> another make. The xen build succeeded.

Glad to hear it.  I'll sort out a better version of that patch
(i.e. that doesn't just remove the code but reimplements it in a
clang-friendly way) tomorrow.

Tim.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel