Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] X86/XEN: Merge x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done setup functions and document its semantic

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:28:29AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 22/08/12 15:47, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >On 22/08/12 15:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:22:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Differences with v1:
> >>>>>- The patch serie is re-arranged in a way that it helps reviews, 
> >>>>>following
> >>>>>    a plan by Thomas Gleixner
> >>>>>- The PVOPS nomenclature is not used as it is not correct
> >>>>>- The front-end message is adjusted with feedback by Thomas Gleixner,
> >>>>>    Stefano Stabellini and Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> >>>>>
> >>>>This is much simpler to read and review. Just have a look at the
> >>>>diffstats of the two series:
> >>>>
> >>>>   6 files changed,  9 insertions(+),  8 deletions(-)
> >>>>   6 files changed, 11 insertions(+),  9 deletions(-)
> >>>>   5 files changed, 50 insertions(+),  2 deletions(-)
> >>>>   6 files changed,  2 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> >>>>   1 files changed,  5 insertions(+),  0 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>>versus
> >>>>
> >>>>   6 files changed, 10 insertions(+),  9 deletions(-)
> >>>>   6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>>>   5 files changed,  3 insertions(+),  3 deletions(-)
> >>>>   6 files changed,  4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>>>   1 files changed,  5 insertions(+),  0 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>>The overall result is basically the same, but it's way simpler to look
> >>>>at obvious and well done patches than checking whether a subtle copy
> >>>>and paste bug happened in 3/5 of the first version. Copy and paste is
> >>>>the #1 cause for subtle bugs. :)
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm waiting for the ack of Xen folks before taking it into tip.

Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
on all patches.

Please tell me which branch its going in so I can merge that one in my tree.
Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>I've some extra patches that modify the new "paginig_init" in the Xen
> >>>code that I am going to propose for v3.7 - so will have some merge
> >>>conflicts. Let me figure that out and also run this set of patches
> >>>(and also the previous one .. which I think you didn't have a
> >>>chance to look since you were on vacation?) on an overnight
> >>>
> >>Which previous one ?
> >>
> >This one:
> >https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/21/369
> >
> >but I would like to repost the patch serie skipping the referral to
> >PVOPS in the commit logs, I will do so right now, so please wait for
> >another patch serie.
> 
> For your convenience:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/22/450
> 
> Attilio

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel