[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] VM save/restore


  • To: Junjie Wei <junjie.wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:17:32 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:18:11 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
  • Thread-index: Ac2Aq4rLnKHghlWqwUGpBhHI28Sbrw==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] VM save/restore

On 20/08/2012 21:58, "Junjie Wei" <junjie.wei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> The check for 64 VCPUs is to cover the fact we only save/restore a 64-bit
>> vcpumap. That would need fixing too surely, ot CPUs > 64 would be offline
>> after restore I would imagine.
>> 
>> And what is a PVM guest?
>> 
>>   -- Keir
>> 
> 
> Paravirtualization / modified kernel. Am I using the wrong term "PVM"?

Ah, I realised that in the end. They're usually just called "PV".

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.