Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] X86/XEN: Merge x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done setup functions and document its semantic

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > Differences with v1:
> > - The patch serie is re-arranged in a way that it helps reviews, following
> >   a plan by Thomas Gleixner
> > - The PVOPS nomenclature is not used as it is not correct
> > - The front-end message is adjusted with feedback by Thomas Gleixner,
> >   Stefano Stabellini and Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
> 
> This is much simpler to read and review. Just have a look at the
> diffstats of the two series:
> 
>  6 files changed,  9 insertions(+),  8 deletions(-)
>  6 files changed, 11 insertions(+),  9 deletions(-)
>  5 files changed, 50 insertions(+),  2 deletions(-)
>  6 files changed,  2 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>  1 files changed,  5 insertions(+),  0 deletions(-)
> 
> versus
> 
>  6 files changed, 10 insertions(+),  9 deletions(-)
>  6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>  5 files changed,  3 insertions(+),  3 deletions(-)
>  6 files changed,  4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>  1 files changed,  5 insertions(+),  0 deletions(-)
> 
> The overall result is basically the same, but it's way simpler to look
> at obvious and well done patches than checking whether a subtle copy
> and paste bug happened in 3/5 of the first version. Copy and paste is
> the #1 cause for subtle bugs. :)
> 
> I'm waiting for the ack of Xen folks before taking it into tip.

They are OK by me. Konrad?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel