Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] X86/XEN: Introduce the x86_init.paging.pagetable_init PVOPS

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote:

> This new PVOPS is responsible to setup the kernel pagetables and
> replace entirely x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and
> x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done PVOPS work.
 
> For performance the x86_64 stub is implemented as a macro to paging_init()
> rather than an actual function stub.

Huch, using a macro for an once per boot time call is really a massive
performance improvement.

It's confusing and wrong. You just use a macro because x86_64 does not
need any extra setups aside of paging_init().
 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
> index 849be14..c1e910a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct x86_init_ops x86_init __initdata = {
>       },
>  
>       .paging = {
> +             .pagetable_init         = native_pagetable_init,

I'd prefer to see these patches implemented differently.

 #1 Remove the base argument from pagetable_setup_start (leave
    pagetable_setup_done() alone).

 #2 Rename pagetable_setup_start to pagetable_init,
    native_pagetable_setup_start to native_pagetable_init and
    xen_pagetable_setup_start to xen_pagetable_init
 
 #3 Instead of copying the whole native_pagetable_setup_start()
    function and deleting it later, move the paging_init() call from
    setup.c to native_pagetable_init() and xen_pagetable_init()
    and define native_pagetable_init as paging_init() for x86_64

 #4 Move the code from xen_pagetable_setup_done() into
    xen_pagetable_init() and remove the now unused
    pagetable_setup_done().

That's less code shuffling and pointless copying which makes the
review way easier.

Thanks,

        tglx

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel