[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Regression in kernel 3.5 as Dom0 regarding PCI Passthrough?!
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek > Wilk > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:30 AM > To: Tobias Geiger > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Regression in kernel 3.5 as Dom0 regarding PCI > Passthrough?! > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:16:33PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:30:00PM +0200, Tobias Geiger wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > i notice a serious regression with 3.5 as Dom0 kernel (3.4 was rock > > > > stable): > > > > > > > > 1st: only the GPU PCI Passthrough works, the PCI USB Controller is > > > > not recognized within the DomU (HVM Win7 64) > > > > Dom0 cmdline is: > > > > ro root=LABEL=dom0root > xen-pciback.hide=(08:00.0)(08:00.1)(00:1d.0)(00:1d.1)(00:1d.2)(00:1d.7) > > > > security=apparmor noirqdebug nouveau.msi=1 > > > > > > > > Only 8:00.0 and 8:00.1 get passed through without problems, all the > > > > USB Controller IDs are not correctly passed through and get a > > > > exclamation mark within the win7 device manager ("could not be > > > > started"). > > > > > > Ok, but they do get passed in though? As in, QEMU sees them. > > > If you boot a Live Ubuntu/Fedora CD within the guest with the PCI > > > passed in devices do you see them? Meaning lspci shows them? > > > > > > > > > Is the lspci -vvv output in dom0 different from 3.4 vs 3.5? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2nd: After DomU shutdown , Dom0 panics (100% reproducable) - > sorry > > > > that i have no full stacktrace, all i have is a "screenshot" which i > > > > uploaded here: > > > > > http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/52/img20120724235921.jpg/ > > > > > > Ugh, that looks like somebody removed a large chunk of a pagetable. > > > > > > Hmm. Are you using dom0_mem=max parameter? If not, can you try > > > that and also disable ballooning in the xm/xl config file pls? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With 3.4 both issues were not there - everything worked perfectly. > > > > Tell me which debugging info you need, i may be able to re-install > > > > my netconsole to get the full stacktrace (but i had not much luck > > > > with netconsole regarding kernel panics - rarely this info gets sent > > > > before the "panic"...) > > > > So I am able to reproduce this with a Windows 7 with an ATI 4870 and > > an Intel 82574L NIC. The video card still works, but the NIC stopped > > working. Same version of hypervisor/toolstack/etc, only change is the > > kernel (v3.4.6->v3.5). > > > > Time to get my hands greasy with this.. > > And its due to a patch I added in v3.4 > (cd9db80e5257682a7f7ab245a2459648b3c8d268) > - which did not work properly in v3.4, but with v3.5 got it working > (977f857ca566a1e68045fcbb7cfc9c4acb077cf0) which causes v3.5 to now > work > anymore. > > Anyhow, for right now jsut revert > cd9db80e5257682a7f7ab245a2459648b3c8d268 > and it should work for you. > Also, our team reported a VT-d bug 2 months ago. http://bugzilla.xen.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1824 We found "3bb07f1b73ea6313b843807063e183e168c9182a" is the bad commit in linux tree. Linux3.4.7 works fine; but Linux 3.5 has this issue. Seem Tobias has the same issue as that in the bug. But we didn't meet Dom0 panic when shutting down the DomU. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |