Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: Add support for cpuid masking on Intel Xeon Processor E5 Family

["Dugger, Donald D" <donald.d.dugger@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jan-

If we're using git doesn't `git -amend' do what you want?  If we're talking 
`hg' then I have no clue.

--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786


-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:48 AM
To: Ian Campbell
Cc: Matt Wilson; Dugger, Donald D; Liu, Jinsong; Nakajima, Jun; 
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Keir(Xen.org)
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86: Add support for cpuid masking on 
Intel Xeon Processor E5 Family

>>> On 08.08.12 at 10:02, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 08:08 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 07.08.12 at 19:47, Matt Wilson <msw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > For what it's worth, I think that the first line of the commit log got
>> > dropped, which makes for a strange short log message of:
>> > 
>> >   Although the "Intel Virtualization Technology FlexMigration
>> 
>> Yes, I'm sorry for that, but I realized this only after pushing, and
>> I'm unaware of ways to adjust the commit message of an existing
>> c/s.
> 
> There is an hg rebase extension something like git's rebase -i but I
> find the easiest way is to use the mq extension's function which pulls
> the tip commit into a patch in the queue.
> 
> Actually, that's not quite true, I find the real easiest way is to hg
> strip the wrong commit and try again.

But that's only if it didn't get pushed yet?

> Actually, that's not true either, the real easiest way IMHO is to use a
> git mirror for all the leg work and Ian J's git2hgapply script to
> actually "apply" it. YMMV depending on your feelings about git
> though ;-)

Indeed. While I'm slowly getting to know it better, I'm still not
really friends with it.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel