Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 1 of 1] [xen-4.1.2] libxl: Seal tapdisk minor leak.

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 1 of 1] [xen-4.1.2] libxl: Seal 
tapdisk minor leak."):
> On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 16:14 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Dr. Greg Wettstein writes ("[Patch 1 of 1] [xen-4.1.2] libxl: Seal tapdisk 
> > minor leak."):
> > > libxl: Seal tapdisk minor leak.
> > ...
> > > To implement correct cleanup of blktap devices in Xen 4.1.2.
> > 
> > Is this patch is supposed to be against xen-4.1-testing.hg ?
> > 
> > > diff -r b2b7a7a49af5 tools/libxl/libxl_blktap2.c
> > > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_blktap2.c Sat Aug 04 16:17:08 2012 -0500
> > > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_blktap2.c Sun Aug 05 09:22:35 2012 -0500
> > > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ void libxl__device_destroy_tapdisk(libxl
> > 
> > This function doesn't seem to exist in my copy of xen-4.1-testing.hg
> > tip nor in 23172:3eca5bf65e6c.
> 
> It comes from <201208051440.q75Een7F008501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> which is a
> backport request that introduces this function.

Oh I see, these are two interdependent patches.  Let me read them
again.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel