[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] xen: virq, remove VIRQ_XC_RESERVED
On 6 August 2012 15:56, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:46 +0100, Jean Guyader wrote: >> On 6 August 2012 09:10, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> On 03.08.12 at 21:50, Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> VIRQ_XC_RESERVED was reserved for V4V but we have switched >> >> to event channels so this place holder is no longer required. >> > >> > I'm fine with this change, but is a future re-use of the value indeed >> > not going to cause problems on XenServer (or wherever else this >> > is patch set coming from)? >> > >> >> That may need to be confirmed but I don't think XenServer is using v4v >> yet > > I think Jan probably meant XenClient (i.e. that being the place where > v4v is already deployed). > > There's no harm in keeping this # reserved indefinitely, with a suitable > comment, I think? The only reason not to would be if this address space > was limited, but I don't think that is the case with VIRQs > > I think if XenClient rebase to a new version of Xen we will probably use the version of v4v that comes with it and we will not try to rebase the old code on the newer Xen. But if you think we should keep it I don't mind. Jean _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |