Re: [Xen-devel] xl segfault when starting a guest

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xl segfault when starting a guest"):
> It looks like 25727:a8d708fcb347 is missing some bits of my original
> patch got missed during application, specifically the changes to the
> iscsi/nbd/enbd prefix handling rule.

This was because:
 - I mistakenly used the copy of the patch that Ian C had CC'd to me,
   rather than the copy I got via the mailing list.  The former went
   via the Citrix corporate email system which mangles things, which
   is why this is a bad idea.  The latter does not.
 - When I tried to apply it, it produced a bunch of rejects in the
   autogenerated files.  However buried in those messages was a reject
   in the .l source file, which I didn't spot.
 - I therefore tried to regenerate the flex source (perhaps not with
   complete success) and committed the result. 
Sorry for messing this up.

I have backed out 25727:a8d708fcb347 and reapplied what I think is a
non-mangled version as 25733:353bc0801b11.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel