[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Should we revert "mm: New XENMEM space, XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range"?
>>> On 01.08.12 at 20:06, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Should we be changing our rules on public headers, allowing > compiler-specific extensions to precisely lay out our structures? Quite > possibly. We used to do that, but it got shot down by the ppc and ia64 > arches who wanted an easier life and just rely on compiler default layout > for a particular platform. Of course those maintainers aren't actually > voting any more. ;) In the expectation that other architectures might get ported, keeping the headers as generic as possible is likely the best thing to do. After all it was (hopefully!) for a reason that the PPC and/or IA64 folks wanted the non-standard stuff to be removed. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |