Re: [Xen-devel] XSM instead of IS_PRIV

[Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>]

> Once this is done, it will make sense to change the XSM header file so
> that the appropriate xsm_* hooks resolve to IS_PRIV when XSM is not
> enabled. This would allow the IS_PRIV hooks covered by XSM to be
> completely removed, assuming the Xen developers agree that the XSM hooks
> cover all all the important code.

Thanks for replying. So, is there consensus among the Xen community
to adopt this patch (xsm hooks replacing IS_PRIV) on upstream Xen?

thanks,
Shakeel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel