[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen/swiotlb: If iommu=soft was not passed in on > 4GB, don't turn it on.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:06:27PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > If we boot a 64-bit guest with more than 4GB memory, the SWIOTLB > > gets turned on: > > PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB) > > software IO TLB [mem 0xfb43d000-0xff43cfff] (64MB) mapped at > > [ffff8800fb43d000-ffff8800ff43cfff] > > > > which is OK if we had PCI devices, but not if we did not. In a PV > > guest the SWIOTLB ends up asking the hypervisor for precious lowmem > > memory - and 64MB of it per guest. On a 32GB machine, this limits the > > amount of guests that are 4GB to start due to lowmem exhaustion. > > > > What we do is detect whether the user supplied e820_hole=1 > > parameter, which is used to construct an E820 that is similar to > > the machine - so that the PCI regions do not overlap with RAM regions. > > We check for that by looking at the E820 and seeing if it diverges > > from the standard - and if so (and if iommu=soft was not turned on), > > we disable the check pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb code. > > What kind of paramter is it? > Is it a Linux cmdline paramter? Or maybe a Xen toolstack parameter? Its a guest config option. > > Surely there must be a better way to let Linux know if this paramter has > been turned on than looking for ACPI entries in the E820. I am all open for suggestions. The best way I can think of is to have some early_init variant of XenBus-detect-this-backend-parameter. Can one unhook an "old" XenBus and reset with the full-fledged XenBus init later on? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |