Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] libxl: fix reentrancy hazard in fd event processing

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:04 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 1/2] libxl: fix reentrancy hazard in fd 
> event processing"):
> > On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 17:10 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 1/2] libxl: fix reentrancy hazard in fd 
> > > event processing"):
> > > > On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 19:18 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > >   Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> > > > >   #0  0x00007f7ff743131b in afterpoll_check_fd (poller=<optimized 
> > > > > out>, fds=0x7f7ff7b241c0, nfds=7, fd=-1, events=1)
> > > > >       at libxl_event.c:856
> > > > >   856             if (fds[slot].fd != fd)
> > > > 
> > > > Has Roger or you tested this now?
> > > 
> > > I still haven't tested the new version I'm afraid.
> > 
> > OK, I'll hold off on committing then.
> 
> I have now tested these as part of my testing of Roger's hotplug
> series.

Thx. Added Roger's Tested-by and my Acked-by and committed.




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel