[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 1/6] Xen/MCE: stick all 1's to MCi_CTL of vMCE
Ah, sorry, I didn't notice Keir has checked this patch in. Please ignore patch 1/6. Thanks for point out! Regards, Jinsong Christoph Egger wrote: > Where is the difference to c/s 25616:8a4cda0bbdc2 ? > > Christoph > > > On 07/23/12 11:38, Liu, Jinsong wrote: > >> Xen/MCE: stick all 1's to MCi_CTL of vMCE >> >> This patch is a middle-work patch, prepare for future new vMCE model. >> It remove mci_ctl array, and keep MCi_CTL all 1's. >> >> Signed-off-by: Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> diff -r 4f92bdf3370c xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c Wed Jun 27 09:36:43 2012 +0200 >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c Fri Jul 06 10:05:46 2012 +0800 >> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ >> >> /* Real value in physical CTL MSR */ >> static uint64_t __read_mostly h_mcg_ctl; >> -static uint64_t *__read_mostly h_mci_ctrl; >> >> int vmce_init_msr(struct domain *d) >> { >> @@ -33,15 +32,6 @@ >> if ( !dom_vmce(d) ) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> - dom_vmce(d)->mci_ctl = xmalloc_array(uint64_t, nr_mce_banks); >> - if ( !dom_vmce(d)->mci_ctl ) >> - { >> - xfree(dom_vmce(d)); >> - return -ENOMEM; >> - } >> - memset(dom_vmce(d)->mci_ctl, ~0, >> - nr_mce_banks * sizeof(*dom_vmce(d)->mci_ctl)); - >> dom_vmce(d)->mcg_status = 0x0; >> dom_vmce(d)->mcg_ctl = ~(uint64_t)0x0; >> dom_vmce(d)->nr_injection = 0; >> @@ -56,7 +46,6 @@ >> { >> if ( !dom_vmce(d) ) >> return; >> - xfree(dom_vmce(d)->mci_ctl); >> xfree(dom_vmce(d)); >> dom_vmce(d) = NULL; >> } >> @@ -93,9 +82,8 @@ >> switch ( msr & (MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) ) >> { >> case MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL: >> - if ( bank < nr_mce_banks ) >> - *val = vmce->mci_ctl[bank] & >> - (h_mci_ctrl ? h_mci_ctrl[bank] : ~0UL); >> + /* stick all 1's to MCi_CTL */ >> + *val = ~0UL; >> mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: rdmsr MC%u_CTL 0x%"PRIx64"\n", >> bank, *val); >> break; >> @@ -220,8 +208,10 @@ >> switch ( msr & (MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) ) >> { >> case MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL: >> - if ( bank < nr_mce_banks ) >> - vmce->mci_ctl[bank] = val; >> + /* >> + * if guest crazy clear any bit of MCi_CTL, >> + * treat it as not implement and ignore write change it. + >> */ break; >> case MSR_IA32_MC0_STATUS: >> if ( entry && (entry->bank == bank) ) >> @@ -523,22 +513,6 @@ >> int vmce_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) >> { >> u64 value; >> - unsigned int i; >> - >> - if ( !h_mci_ctrl ) >> - { >> - h_mci_ctrl = xmalloc_array(uint64_t, nr_mce_banks); >> - if (!h_mci_ctrl) >> - { >> - dprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "Failed to alloc h_mci_ctrl\n"); >> - return -ENOMEM; >> - } >> - /* Don't care banks before firstbank */ >> - memset(h_mci_ctrl, ~0, >> - min(firstbank, nr_mce_banks) * sizeof(*h_mci_ctrl)); >> - for (i = firstbank; i < nr_mce_banks; i++) >> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL(i), h_mci_ctrl[i]); >> - } >> >> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_CAP, value); >> /* For Guest vMCE usage */ >> @@ -551,18 +525,13 @@ >> >> static int mca_ctl_conflict(struct mcinfo_bank *bank, struct domain >> *d) { >> - int bank_nr; >> - >> - if ( !bank || !d || !h_mci_ctrl ) >> + if ( !bank || !d ) >> return 1; >> >> /* Will MCE happen in host if If host mcg_ctl is 0? */ >> if ( ~d->arch.vmca_msrs->mcg_ctl & h_mcg_ctl ) return >> 1; >> >> - bank_nr = bank->mc_bank; >> - if (~d->arch.vmca_msrs->mci_ctl[bank_nr] & h_mci_ctrl[bank_nr] ) >> - return 1; >> return 0; >> } >> >> diff -r 4f92bdf3370c xen/include/asm-x86/mce.h >> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/mce.h Wed Jun 27 09:36:43 2012 +0200 >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/mce.h Fri Jul 06 10:05:46 2012 +0800 @@ >> -18,7 +18,6 @@ /* Guest should not change below values after >> DOM boot up */ uint64_t mcg_ctl; uint64_t mcg_status; >> - uint64_t *mci_ctl; >> uint16_t nr_injection; >> struct list_head impact_header; >> spinlock_t lock; _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |