[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH WIP 2/6] xen/arm: Introduce xen_guest_init
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 05:14:41PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > We used to rely on a core_initcall to initialize Xen on ARM, however > core_initcalls are actually called after early consoles are initialized. > That means that hvc_xen.c is going to be initialized before Xen. > > Given the lack of a better alternative, just call a new Xen > initialization function (xen_guest_init) from xen_cons_init. > > xen_guest_init has to be arch independant, so write both an ARM and an > x86 implementation. The x86 implementation is currently empty because we > can be sure that xen_hvm_guest_init is called early enough. > > Probably we can get rid of this as soon as we have better DT support. What is DT? > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 12 ++++++++---- > arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 8 ++++++++ > drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c | 3 +++ > include/xen/xen.h | 2 ++ > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > index 7d76962..e1c2e4d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c > @@ -127,12 +127,16 @@ out: > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_remap_domain_mfn_range); > > -void __ref xen_hvm_init_shared_info(void) > +static void __init xen_hvm_init_shared_info(void) > { > int cpu; > struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp; > static struct shared_info *shared_info_page = 0; > > + /* already setup */ > + if (shared_info_page != 0 && HYPERVISOR_shared_info == shared_info_page) > + return; > + > if (!shared_info_page) > shared_info_page = (struct shared_info *) > get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL); > @@ -161,11 +165,11 @@ void __ref xen_hvm_init_shared_info(void) > per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = > &HYPERVISOR_shared_info->vcpu_info[cpu]; > } > } > +core_initcall(xen_hvm_init_shared_info); > > -static int __init xen_hvm_guest_init(void) > +int __init xen_guest_init(void) > { > xen_hvm_init_shared_info(); > return 0; Don't you want to do: return xen_hvm_init_shared_info(); why do we need to return int? > } > - > -core_initcall(xen_hvm_guest_init); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_guest_init); > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > index 1f92865..0bad7b5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > @@ -1420,4 +1420,12 @@ const struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_xen_hvm > __refconst = { > .init_platform = xen_hvm_guest_init, > }; > EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_hyper_xen_hvm); > + > +int __init xen_guest_init(void) > +{ > + /* do nothing: rely on x86_hyper_xen_hvm for the initialization */ > + return 0; > + > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xen_guest_init); _GPL please. > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c > index 3ae96a9..52a98ff 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvc_xen.c > @@ -578,6 +578,9 @@ static int xen_cons_init(void) > if (!xen_domain()) > return 0; > > + /* retrieve xen infos */ > + xen_guest_init(); So shouldn't this be: if (xen_guest_init()) return .. something? > + > if (xen_initial_domain()) > ops = &dom0_hvc_ops; > else { > diff --git a/include/xen/xen.h b/include/xen/xen.h > index 2c0d3a5..792a4d2 100644 > --- a/include/xen/xen.h > +++ b/include/xen/xen.h > @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@ enum xen_domain_type { > > #ifdef CONFIG_XEN > extern enum xen_domain_type xen_domain_type; > +int xen_guest_init(void); > #else > #define xen_domain_type XEN_NATIVE > +static inline int xen_guest_init(void) { return 0; } > #endif > > #define xen_domain() (xen_domain_type != XEN_NATIVE) > -- > 1.7.2.5 > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |