Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-win

[Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:45 AM, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> branch xen-unstable
> xen branch xen-unstable
> job test-amd64-amd64-xl-win
> test windows-install
>
> Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
> Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-unstable.git
> Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
> Tree: xen http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-unstable.hg
>
> *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
>
>   Bug is in tree:  xen http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-unstable.hg
>   Bug introduced:  dbf54d93ac40
>   Bug not present: d70030d6a87c
>
>
>   changeset:   25563:dbf54d93ac40
>   user:        Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
>   date:        Fri Jun 29 08:58:22 2012 +0100
>
>       xl: initialise domid to an explicitly invalid value
>
>       also ensure it is invalid whenever we destroy the domain.
>
>       Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
>       Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>       Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson.citrix.com>

I haven't tested it, but I think we are missing a "domid =
INVALID_DOMID;" in the "LIBXL_ACTION_ON_SHUTDOWN_RESTART_RENAME" case.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel