Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/21] libxl: domain save/restore: run in a separate process

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Shriram Rajagopalan writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 00/21] libxl: domain save/restore: 
run in a separate process"):
> Btw, my earlier mail was in response to remus not
> working on the baseline setup on your dev environment.

Right, thanks.

> The fix works for 2 out of 3 cases
>  blackhole replication (xl remus -b)
>  localhost replication with failover i.e. destroy primary (xl remus domU 
> localhost)

Good.

> However, it crashes the guest for localhost replication, when I destroy the 
> backup
> i.e. xl destroy domU--incoming . The primary guest would generally resume, 
> but in this
> case its in --sc- state.
> NB: This seems to happen in baseline xen-unstable too!.

So in this case my series, with the fixup patch I sent, is no worse
than baseline xen-unstable ?

In that case I think the best thing would probably be for me to resend
my series with the fixups integrated, and commit it to xen-unstable
while we look into the remus problems.  Would that be OK with you ?

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel