Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 07/13] libxl: convert libxl_device_nic_add to an async operation

[Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Jackson wrote:
> Roger Pau Monne writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 07/13] libxl: convert libxl_device_nic_add to 
> an async operation"):
> > Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Should we rename the functions libxl_*nic* or the structures *vif* ?
> > > Or should we rename both, to "net" perhaps ?
> > I think we should either rename the strucutres to nic also (because the
> > also hold ioemu cards), or get rid of nic/vif an name everything net.
> Can you try to rename everything to `net' and see if that turns out to
> be an impenetrable yak ?
I think it is much more easy to rename everything to nic, which provides 
the same level of abstraction from my PoV. Renaming everything to net 
it's a rather very big change. Would you be ok with that change?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel