[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxl: document the memory ownership of some functions

To: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:21:17 +0100
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:21:36 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Dario Faggioli writes ("[PATCH v2] libxl: document the memory ownership of some 
functions"):
> Specifying they allocate dynamic memory that needs to be explicitly freed.

Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxl: document the memory ownership of some functions
  - From: Dario Faggioli

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 06/13] libxl: convert libxl_device_disk_add to an async op
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 07/13] libxl: convert libxl_device_nic_add to an async operation
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libxl: document the memory ownership of some functions
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/21] libxl: domain save/restore: run in a separate process
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.