[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/PCI: pass correct register value to XSM
>>> On 21.06.12 at 19:01, Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When attempting to use AMD's extension to access the extended PCI config > space, only the low byte of the register number was being passed to XSM. > Include the correct value of the register if this feature is enabled; > otherwise, bits 24-30 of port cf8 are reserved, so disallow the invalid > access. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/x86/traps.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > index 2264583..d836452 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c > @@ -1686,11 +1686,24 @@ static int pci_cfg_ok(struct domain *d, int write, > int size) > { > uint32_t machine_bdf; > uint16_t start, end; > + uint64_t msr_val; > if (!IS_PRIV(d)) > return 0; > > machine_bdf = (d->arch.pci_cf8 >> 8) & 0xFFFF; > start = d->arch.pci_cf8 & 0xFF; > + if ( d->arch.pci_cf8 & 0x0F000000 ) > + { > + /* Possible AMD extended configuration access */ > + if ( boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD || > + boot_cpu_data.x86 < 0x10 || boot_cpu_data.x86 > 0x17 ) > + return 0; > + if ( rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_NB_CFG, msr_val) ) > + return 0; > + if ( !(msr_val & (1ULL << AMD64_NB_CFG_CF8_EXT_ENABLE_BIT)) ) > + return 0; Not quite, still. Let me come back with a modified version later today. Jan > + start |= (d->arch.pci_cf8 >> 16) & 0xF00; > + } > end = start + size - 1; > if (xsm_pci_config_permission(d, machine_bdf, start, end, write)) > return 0; > -- > 1.7.10.2 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |