Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.2 TODO / Release Plan

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 11:48 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 14:57 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >>> On 12.06.12 at 15:00, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > tools, blockers:
> > > > 
> > > >     * Adjustments needed for qdisk backend to work on non-pvops Linux.
> > > >       "qemu/xendisk: set maximum number of grants to be used" (Jan 
> > > > Beulich)
> > > 
> > > Patch was posted and is in upstream qemu, just needs pulling back
> > > into our two clones.
> > 
> > Thanks. CCing Stefano to be sure he knows that...
> 
> qemu-upstream-unstable has been updated, Ian is responsible for
> qemu-xen-unstable.

I was about to ping Ian J about this, because there seems to be breakage
which would be fixed by this (Olaf: "grant table errors with
qemu-xen-traditional" today) but it looks like these patches weren't
actually submitted against the traditional tree? Or at least I can't
find any such thing.

Does the patch in <4FC770E20200007800087298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> apply
as is to the trad tree? Has any one tried running it? Is this what Olaf
tested in the thread referenced above?

That thread also references
<4FABFCF40200007800082CE0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> as something which
should be applied to the trad tree too. Has anyone tested that combo?

I can see how Ian missed this -- it very much looked like those two
patches were for qemu-upstream only to me (from the subject, cc line etc
etc).

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel