Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/18] libxl: domain save/restore: run in a separate process [and 4 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/18] libxl: domain 
save/restore: run in a separate process [and 4 more messages]"):
> To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Uh, sorry about the duplicated header.

> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/18] libxl: domain 
> save/restore: run in a separate process"):
> > BTW, since I've been ctrl-c'ing "xl migrate" a bunch I noticed that we
> > seem to leak an "xl migrate-receive" and the restore side helper
> > process. Probably pre-existing but I thought it worth mentioning.
> 
> I'll look into this.

This seems better now, at the tip of my series, at least.  If I ctrl-c
xl migrate running via ssh then all the receiver processes, and the
relevant domain, seem to get cleaned up.

If I do xl migrate not running via ssh, eg
   xl migrate -s '' debian.guest.osstest 'xl migrate-recieve'
then both the sender and receiver get my ^C so we leak the domain.  I
think that's the expected behaviour.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel