[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/mm: do direct hypercall in xen_set_pte() if batching is unavailable
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:23:11AM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > On 10/06/12 11:23, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:07:46PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 04:14:54PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: > >>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> In xen_set_pte() if batching is unavailable (because the caller is in > >>> an interrupt context such as handling a page fault) it would fall back > >>> to using native_set_pte() and trapping and emulating the PTE write. > >>> > >>> On 32-bit guests this requires two traps for each PTE write (one for > >>> each dword of the PTE). Instead, do one mmu_update hypercall > >>> directly. > >> > >> OK. > >>> > >>> This significantly improves page fault performance in 32-bit PV > >>> guests. > >> > >> Nice! > > > > With this patch I keep on getting this (which is v3.5-rc2 plus my > > patches in stable/for-linus-3.5 and yours): > [...] > > (XEN) mm.c:659:d0 Could not get page ref for pfn fffffffffffff > > (XEN) mm.c:3460:d0 Could not get page for normal update > > Are you talking about these? I've not seen them. Do you know when they > happen? During the bootup. I hadn't really done much investigation - but reverting your patch (so v3.5-rc2+stable/for-linus-3.5 minus your patch) makes these errors go away. > > The patch doesn't change what PTEs are written or their value so I don't > think I've introduced a regression -- only it now prints a new > warning/error. The boot doesn't finish. It keeps on printing those forever. This is of course dom0 - I hadn't gotten to trying out a domU guest. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |