Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/amd: fix crash as Xen Dom0 on AMD Trinity systems

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>]

* Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:27:13AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 05/30/2012 03:33 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > > > index 75f33b2..e74df95 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> > > > @@ -1116,7 +1116,10 @@ static const struct pv_cpu_ops xen_cpu_ops 
> > > > __initconst = {
> > > >         .wbinvd = native_wbinvd,
> > > >  
> > > >         .read_msr = native_read_msr_safe,
> > > > +       .rdmsr_regs = native_rdmsr_safe_regs,
> > > >         .write_msr = xen_write_msr_safe,
> > > > +       .wrmsr_regs = native_wrmsr_safe_regs,
> > > > +
> > > >         .read_tsc = native_read_tsc,
> > > >         .read_pmc = native_read_pmc,
> > > >  
> > > 
> > > Okay, tell me again:
> > > 
> > > why do we have these hooks again?  Can we please weed out 
> > > paravirt methods that have no users?
> > 
> > ping?
> 
> I think we solved all that and hpa wanted to queue them up shortly:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133856342618027&w=2

Great, will wait for hpa then.

Thanks,

        Ingo

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel