[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 ]libxl: allow to set more than 31 vcpus
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 02:48 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Change from v2: > Add function libxl_cpumap_to_hex_string to covert cpumap to hex string. > According to Ian's comments, modified some codes to make the logic more > reasonable. > > In current implementation, it uses integer to record current avail cpus and > this only allows user to specify 31 vcpus. > In following patch, it uses cpumap instead integer which make more sense than > before. Also there is no limit to the max vcpus. > This part I understand, and looks reasonable. I also see this is the whole point of your other patch, however ... > diff -r 3b0eed731020 tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c > --- a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c Fri Jun 01 09:27:17 2012 +0800 > +++ b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c Fri Jun 01 10:34:13 2012 +0800 > @@ -650,7 +650,14 @@ static void parse_config_data(const char > > if (!xlu_cfg_get_long (config, "vcpus", &l, 0)) { > b_info->max_vcpus = l; > - b_info->cur_vcpus = (1 << l) - 1; > + > + if (libxl_cpumap_alloc(ctx, &b_info->avail_vcpus, l)) { > + fprintf(stderr, "Unable to allocate cpumap\n"); > + exit(1); > + } > ... Do you mind explaining me what would have happened here without your previous patch, i.e., by just using the existing libxl_cpumap_alloc ? I might be wrong, but I was wondering whether it is worth changing the interface like that for just this single case which saves, what, 1 to 3 bytes per domain? Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |