Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 5 V2] libxl: make it possible to explicitly specify default sched params

[Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 08:35 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: 
> > That being said, I'm not sure at what level we want to enforce something
> > like the above. The lowest level toolstack seems fine to me, which would
> > mean putting something like the code above in the config file parsing...
> > If you agree, I'll try that and let you know whether or not it works.
> 
> If you could provide an incremental patch that would be much
> appreciated.
> 
I sure can. :-)

> IMHO it would be fine (and a good idea) for libxl to return ERROR_INVAL
> if the conditions aren't met too. 
>
Ok, sounds reasonable.

> If you want to also check it in xl's
> config file parsing and either fix it up like the above or error out
> then please do.
>
Let's see what fits better...

Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel