Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: prevent xl from running if xend is running.

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: prevent xl from running if 
xend is running."):
> On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:11 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
...
> > +    for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(locks)/sizeof(locks[0]); i++) {
> > +        if (!access(locks[i], F_OK) && !force_execution) {
> > +            fprintf(stderr, "xend is running, which prevents xl from 
> > working "
> > +                            "correctly. If you still want to force the "
> > +                            "execution of xl please use the -f option\n");
> 
> You might as well wrap the output text to 80 columns (I didn't count, I
> assume this isn't...)

It should be.  The best way to do this is probably something like
this:

+            fprintf(stderr,
+ "xend is running, which prevents xl from working correctly.\n"
+ "If you still want to force the execution of xl please use the -f\n"
+ "option\n"
+                    );

(adjust to taste)

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel