Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/apic: implement io apic read with hypercall

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 20.04.12 at 16:50, Lin Ming <mlin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 13:53 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Under what circumstances can these hypercalls fail? Would a BUG_ON be
>>> > appropriate/
>>>
>>> -EFAULT, -EPERM, anything xsm_apic() could return (which looks only to
>>> be -EPERM).
>>
>> So either the guest has called a hypercall which it is not permitted to
>> or it has called it with invalid parameters of one sort or another. Both
>> of these would be a code bug in the guest and therefore asserting that
>> no failure occurred is reasonable?
>>
>> What could the caller do with the error other than log it and collapse?
>>
>>> The call into Xen itself will return 0 as a value if an
>>> invalid physbase is passed in the hypercall.
>>
>>> So a BUG_ON() is not safe/sensible for domU.
>>
>> I think you have successfully argued that it is ;-)
> 
> BUG_ON is too severe. How about WARN_ON?
> 
> ret = hypercall(...)
> 
> if (ret) {
>    WARN_ON(1);
>    return -1;
> }

But if you go with this, please use the more modern

if (WARN_ON(ret))
        return -1;

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel