Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN][RFC PATCH 01/15] hvm: Modify interface to support multiple ioreq server

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 03/23/2012 11:33 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 15:59 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>    
> > Add structure to handle ioreq server. It's server which can
> > handle a range of IO (MMIO and/or PIO) and emulate a PCI.
> > Each server as its own shared page to receive ioreq. So
> > we have introduced to HVM PARAM to set/get the first and
> > the last shared used for ioreq.
> > With it's id, the server knows which page it must use.
> >      
> So id is always the page offset with the range? Why not just call it
> iobuf_offset then? Is the additional layer of abstraction from calling
> it "id" useful if we are just going to peek around it?
>    
Indeed, but this parameter is also used to register bdf/io range.
So can we call it server_id or server_offset ?

> > diff --git a/xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_op.h b/xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_op.h
> > index 6a78f75..1e0e27b 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_op.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_op.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> >   #include "../xen.h"
> >   #include "../trace.h"
> >
> > +#include "hvm_info_table.h" /* HVM_MAX_VCPUS */
> >      
> You don't appear to use HVM_MAX_VCPUS anywhere in your additions?
>
>    
I use it in xen-all.c in QEMU. It permits to check that smp_cpus is lower
that the maximum of vpcus. It avoids page overflow.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel