[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 12436: regressions - FAIL

On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 15:10 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 12436: 
> regressions - FAIL"):
> > On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 16:54 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > This test failure is not related to the single commit made to the
> > > qemu-upstream-unstable tree, since this test doesn't actually even use
> > > qemu-upstream-unstable.  (It's a bug in the test schedule generator
> > > that it even considers this test relevant; it should not run it.)
> > 
> > So actually the upstream qemu is actually passing its testing fairly
> > consistently? Assuming some of the other tests do actually test it.
> No, that's not a valid conclusion.  The tests which do test upstream
> qemu aren't doing very well - but they aren't blocking pushes of
> upstream qemu because the baseline is another version of upstream
> qemu.

Right, I somehow missed/blanked the massive list of failures in the next
section of the original mail.

Lots of them are the xl shutdown needing -F thing and some leak check
failures though, the actual "look like qemu upstream" failures seem to
be far fewer.

> > > I have taken a look at the logs.  I think it is a genuine failure
> > > showing up a real bug, but the bug is in xen-unstable or
> > > qemu-xen-unstable or Jeremy's Linux 2.6.32:
> > 
> > Do we see run this sequence in the flights which are supposed to be
> > testing those or only here?
> Others too.
> > If we do run it elsewhere then we wouldn't be papering over the issue by
> > removing it from this test (where it doesn't belong).
> Indeed.  I plan to do this but I have a other (rather fiddly) stuff
> queued up, related to testing other branches of upstream Linux, which
> I'm trying to get through.

Oh yes, that's more important I think.



Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.