[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.2 Release Plan / TODO
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * xl compatibility with xm: > * feature parity wrt driver domain support (George Dunlap) I just discovered (while playing with driver domains) that xl is missing one bit of feature parity with xm for pci passthrough for PV guests -- and that's the "pci quirk" config file support. I'm going to ask Intel if they have an interest in porting it over; I think it should at least be a "nice-to-have", and it may be a low-level blocker, as a lot of devices won't work passed through without it. > * xl support for "rtc_timeoffset" and "localtime" (Lin > Ming, Patches posted) > * More formally deprecate xm/xend. Manpage patches already in > tree. Needs release noting and communication around -rc1 to > remind people to test xl. > * Domain 0 block attach & general hotplug when using qdisk backend > (need to start qemu as necessary etc) (Stefano S) > * file:// backend performance. qemu-xen-tradition's qdisk is quite > slow & blktap2 not available in upstream kernels. Need to > consider our options: > * qemu-xen's qdisk is thought to be well performing but > qemu-xen is not yet the default. Complexity arising from > splitting qemu-for-qdisk out from qemu-for-dm and > running N qemu's. > * potentially fully userspace blktap could be ready for > 4.2 > * use /dev/loop+blkback. This requires loop driver AIO and > O_DIRECT patches which are not (AFAIK) yet upstream. > * Leverage XCP's blktap2 DKMS work. > * Other ideas? > * Improved Hotplug script support (Roger Pau Monné, patches > posted) > * Block script support -- follows on from hotplug script (Roger > Pau Monné) > > hypervisor, nice to have: > * solid implementation of sharing/paging/mem-events (using work > queues) (Tim Deegan, Olaf Herring et al -- patches posted) > * "The last patch to use a waitqueue in > __get_gfn_type_access() from Tim works. However, there > are a few users who call __get_gfn_type_access with the > domain_lock held. This part needs to be addressed in > some way." > * Sharing support for AMD (Tim, Andres). > * PoD performance improvements (George Dunlap) > > tools, nice to have: > * Configure/control paging via xl/libxl (Olaf Herring, lots of > discussion around interface, general consensus reached on what > it should look like) > * Upstream qemu feature patches: > * Upstream qemu PCI passthrough support (Anthony Perard, > patches sent) > * Upstream qemu save restore (Anthony Perard, Stefano > Stabellini, patches sent, waiting for upstream ack) > * Nested-virtualisation. Currently "experimental". Likely to > release that way. > * Nested SVM. Tested in a variety of configurations but > still some issues with the most important use case (w7 > XP mode) [0] (Christoph Egger) > * Nested VMX. Needs nested EPT to be genuinely useful. > Need more data on testedness etc (Intel) > * Initial xl support for Remus (memory checkpoint, blackholing) > (Shriram, patches posted, blocked behind qemu save restore > patches) > * xl compatibility with xm: > * xl support for autospawning vncviewer (vncviewer=1 or > otherwise) (Goncalo Gomes) > * support for vif "rate" parameter (Mathieu Gagné) > > [0] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-03/msg00883.html > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |