[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] xHCI not waking up from D3 after S3 Resume on Ivybridge
On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:11 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:05:47PM -0400, Tom Goetz wrote: >> On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Tom Goetz wrote: >>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Tom Goetz wrote: >>> I've just found that if the xHCI is in D3, has a USB device plugged in, and >>> is not waking up, it will wake up when another device in D3 wakes up. >>> Here's the steps I followed: >>> >>> 1. S3 suspend >>> 2. S3 Resume >>> 3. set xHCI power policy to "auto" >>> 4. xHCI goes into D3 >>> 5. Plug USB device into xHCI >>> 6. xHCI does not wake up >>> 7. set e1000e power policy to "auto" >>> 8. Unplug ethernet cable >>> 9. e100e goes into D3 >>> 10. Plug in ethernet cable >>> 11. Both e1000e and xHCI wake up. >> >> I think xHCI waking from D3 when e1000e wakes from D3 is because they share >> the same GPE (0xd). Instrumenting PME polling shows that PME is enabled, but >> PME status is never set on the xHCI when a USB device is plugged in. >> >> What can mask PME from firing when it's enabled on the device? > > Intel had a issue with ACPI tables being incorrect in some Ivy Bridge > systems. This led to the kernel ignoring PMEs from the xHCI host > controller because it didn't know the PME was associated with the xHCI > PCI device. That ACPI table fix was supposed to make it into the Intel > reference BIOS. Have you tried updating your BIOS? Was running last months. Updated today. Still happens. > > However, the kernel was patched to wake up all PCI devices under the PCI > bridge that reported a spurious PME, so you shouldn't even need the BIOS > update. See commit 379021d5c0899fcf9410cae4ca7a59a5a94ca769 "PCI / PM: > Extend PME polling to all PCI devices". I've looked at the that code. I instrumented it to verify that PME was enabled and PME status was never set. > > I don't know why a Linux kernel with that fix that's hosted by Xen > wouldn't work when it worked natively. Perhaps Xen blocks the spurious > PME before it reaches the kernel? > > Can you post the ACPI tables, both before and after suspend, on both the > native Linux install and Xen? I'm assuming you meant the contents of /sys/firmware/acpi. I had previously dumped the DSDT pre and post S3 and not seen any differences. Here are links to zip files of the contents of /sys/firmware/acpi for each situation: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/68173361/Work/acpi_native_postS3.zip http://dl.dropbox.com/u/68173361/Work/acpi_native_preS3.zip http://dl.dropbox.com/u/68173361/Work/acpi_xen_preS3.zip http://dl.dropbox.com/u/68173361/Work/acpi_xen_postS3.zip > > Sarah Sharp Thanks for all of the help. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |