Re: [Xen-devel] backport requests for 4.x-testing

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/03/12 19:38, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 05:44 -0500, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 07/03/12 09:43, Keir Fraser wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2012 11:04, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 24542, 24543, 24570, 24571 (xenoprof fixes)
>>> These changesets do not relate to xenoprof??
>> So they are not.  It appears that there was an off-by-6 numbering error
>> in our patch queue for these patches.  Apologies for that.
> These rev numbers are not globally meaningful, you need to use the node
> hash if you want to reliably refer to particular changesets.

The node hashes were correct, which is how I verified the patches after
the error was noticed.  I just naively assumed that the patches in the
"explicitly from xen-unstable.hg" section would have the correct rev
numbers as well.

I have checked all other patches and am now fairly happy that they are
correct, and shall be more vigilant as new patches are being added.

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel