[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] processor passthru - upload _Cx and _Pxx data to hypervisor (v5).
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:23:42AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 23.02.12 at 23:31, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> wrote: > > This module (processor-passthru) collects the information that the cpufreq > > drivers and the ACPI processor code save in the 'struct acpi_processor' and > > then uploads it to the hypervisor. > > Thus looks conceptually wrong to me - there shouldn't be a need for a > CPUFreq driver to be loaded in Dom0 (or your module should masquerade > as the one and only suitable one). I piggyback on the generic cpufreq drivers to collect the information they have evaluated. I can make the driver a cpufreq one but there does not seem to be a way from the kernel to force a specific driver to say "use me". I could write it naturally, but not sure what the usage case is except for the driver I wrote. But perhaps there is also for the cpufreq powernow-k8 and acpi-processor so that they can function without the need for strict compile order (where powernow-k8 MUST be loaded before acpi-processor). > > > On the hypervisor side, it requires this patch on AMD: > > # HG changeset patch > > # Parent aea8cfac8cf1afe397f2e1d422a852008d8a83fe > > traps: AMD PM RDMSRs (MSR_K8_PSTATE_CTRL, etc) > > > > The restriction to read and write the AMD power management MSRs is gated if > > the > > domain 0 is the PM domain (so FREQCTL_dom0_kernel is set). But we can > > relax this restriction and allow the privileged domain to read the MSRs > > (but not write). This allows the priviliged domain to harvest the power > > management information (ACPI _PSS states) and send it to the hypervisor. > > Why would accessing these MSRs be necessary here, when it isn't > for non-pvops? Perhaps only because you want a CPUFreq driver > loaded? Correct. The powernow-k8 > > Jan > > > This patch works fine with older classic dom0 (2.6.32) and with > > AMD K7 and K8 boxes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > diff -r aea8cfac8cf1 xen/arch/x86/traps.c > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Thu Feb 23 13:23:02 2012 -0500 > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Thu Feb 23 13:29:00 2012 -0500 > > @@ -2484,7 +2484,7 @@ static int emulate_privileged_op(struct > > case MSR_K8_PSTATE7: > > if ( boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD ) > > goto fail; > > - if ( !is_cpufreq_controller(v->domain) ) > > + if ( !is_cpufreq_controller(v->domain) && !IS_PRIV(v->domain) ) > > { > > regs->eax = regs->edx = 0; > > break; > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |