[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 4 v3] blkif.h: Define and document the request number/size/segments extension
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:38 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:07 +0000, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >> Note: As of __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__ 0x00040201 the definition of >> BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST has changed. Drivers must be updated >> to, at minimum, use BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_HEADER_BLOCK, before being >> recompiled with a __XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION greater than or equal to >> this value. >> >> This extension first appeared in the FreeBSD Operating System. >> >> Signed-off-by: Justin T. Gibbs <justing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> diff -r 09051133e2fe -r a777cbc5f48b xen/include/public/io/blkif.h >> --- a/xen/include/public/io/blkif.h Mon Feb 20 11:02:53 2012 -0700 >> +++ b/xen/include/public/io/blkif.h Mon Feb 20 11:03:01 2012 -0700 >> @@ -145,6 +145,32 @@ >> * The maximum supported size of the request ring buffer in units of >> * machine pages. The value must be a power of 2. >> * >> + * max-requests <uint32_t> >> + * Default Value: BLKIF_MAX_RING_REQUESTS(PAGE_SIZE) >> + * Maximum Value: BLKIF_MAX_RING_REQUESTS(PAGE_SIZE * max-ring-pages) >> + * >> + * The maximum number of concurrent, logical requests that will be >> + * issued by the backend. > > by "issued" do you mean the maximum number that the backend is willing > to consume/have-in-flight at once? I guess that means issued to the > underlying storage? (backend doesn't issue requests to the frontend does > it? That's how I first read it, hence my question) > > Ian. > I should have used the same language as in the other entries. Does this make more sense? * The maximum number of concurrent, logical requests supported by * the backend. -- Justin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |