Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2 V4] libxl - Remus support

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:06:32 -0800

Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rshriram@xxxxxxxxx designates 10.204.148.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rshriram@xxxxxxxxx

Cc: brendan@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:07:40 +0000

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

rshriram@xxxxxxxxx writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2 V4] libxl - Remus support"):

> This patch series introduces a basic framework to incorporate
> Remus into the libxl toolstack. The only functionality currently
> implemented is memory checkpointing.

Thanks. ÂI'm afraid this doesn't apply to current tip:

And it wont :), as these patches are not independent.
As I mentioned in the introductory email,

'These patches depend on
Â1. "V3 libxl: refactor suspend/resume code" patch series (patches 1,2,3,5,6)
Â Â (note: patches 1 & 2 have already been committed and others have been
Â Â Âacked by Ian Campbell)

Â2. V4 of "libxl: support suspend_cancel in domain_resume"
Â (message id: 47366457a52076b78c52.1328837508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

Â3. Stefano's "V4 libxl: save/restoâre qemu physmap"

Â'

patching file tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2878
Hunk #5 FAILED at 3102
2 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c.rej

While you're refreshing it, could you rewrap the lines in xl.pod.1 to
be within 75-80 columns ?

Certainly, if it comes to resending the patches.

thanks
shriram

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel