[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm: use a per-VCPU stack

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:58:26 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:58:56 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

At 14:43 +0000 on 20 Feb (1329749035), Ian Campbell wrote:
> We do not do any lazy state switching. Outside of context_switch() the current
> stack is always that of the VCPU which current returns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm: use a per-VCPU stack
  - From: Ian Campbell

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: use a per-VCPU stack
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: use a per-VCPU stack
  - From: Tim Deegan
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: use a per-VCPU stack
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: use a per-VCPU stack
  - From: Tim Deegan
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm: use a per-VCPU stack
  - From: Ian Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hvm: Correct RTC time offset update error due to tm->tm_year
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hvm: Correct RTC time offset update error due to tm->tm_year
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm: use a per-VCPU stack
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm: use a per-VCPU stack
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.