|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: replace list_del and INIT_LIST_HEAD with list_del_init
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 14:03 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Is this safe to take without the other vgic patch?
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> index 520a400..c34661b 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> @@ -501,8 +501,7 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id,
> struct cpu_user_regs *r
> p->desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
> GICC[GICC_DIR] = virq;
> }
> - list_del(&p->link);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->link);
> + list_del_init(&p->link);
David said:
I don't think you need the INIT_LIST_HEAD() here (and even if
you did you should use list_del_init()). You only need to init
nodes if you need to test if they are in a list or not.
But I'm not seeing where we test if a node is in a list or not, have I
missed it?
> cpu_raise_softirq(current->processor, VGIC_SOFTIRQ);
> spin_unlock(¤t->arch.vgic.lock);
> }
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |