[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: replace list_del and INIT_LIST_HEAD with list_del_init
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 14:03 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Is this safe to take without the other vgic patch? > --- > xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 3 +-- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > index 520a400..c34661b 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c > @@ -501,8 +501,7 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, > struct cpu_user_regs *r > p->desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS; > GICC[GICC_DIR] = virq; > } > - list_del(&p->link); > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->link); > + list_del_init(&p->link); David said: I don't think you need the INIT_LIST_HEAD() here (and even if you did you should use list_del_init()). You only need to init nodes if you need to test if they are in a list or not. But I'm not seeing where we test if a node is in a list or not, have I missed it? > cpu_raise_softirq(current->processor, VGIC_SOFTIRQ); > spin_unlock(¤t->arch.vgic.lock); > } _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |