[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vpmu: Is CONFIG_SMP used anymore?
On 08/02/12 05:57, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 08/02/2012 13:14, "Dietmar Hahn" <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> while locking at the vpmu stuff I found the following stuff: >> >> diff -r a55e0f9c7b4e xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c Wed Feb 08 12:28:47 2012 +0100 >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c Wed Feb 08 14:11:06 2012 +0100 >> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int __init p4_init(char ** cpu_ty >> } >> >> #ifndef CONFIG_SMP >> - *cpu_type = "i386/p4", XENOPROF_CPU_TYPE_SIZE); >> + *cpu_type = "i386/p4"; >> model = &op_p4_spec; >> return 1; >> #else >> >> >> Is CONFIG_SMP always switched on? It seems nobody tested without CONFIG_SMP. > Correct. !CONFIG_SMP isn't configurable or supported. > > -- Keir A naive test: andrewcoop@andrewcoop:/local/xen-unstable.hg/xen$ rgrep "CONFIG_SMP" * | wc -l 166 Seems there are quite a few bits to remove. If noone has done so, when I get round to gutting #ifdef __ia64__'s from the arch/x86 tree I shall do the same with CONFIG_SMP. ~Andrew >> Thanks. >> >> Dietmar. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel -- Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |