[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] amd iommu: Fix a return value of guest_iommu_set_base()
>>> On 03.02.12 at 16:29, Wei Wang <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx> wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Wei Wang <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx> > # Date 1328282938 -3600 > # Node ID 58a2281581a4c4171ca52549b3e8062b9733ec2b > # Parent 3432abcf9380d3840ca38439a304f74a37d155fc > amd iommu: Fix a return value of guest_iommu_set_base() > Remove a unnecessary check in guest_iommu_destroy() > > Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx> > > diff -r 3432abcf9380 -r 58a2281581a4 xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_guest.c > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_guest.c Thu Feb 02 15:47:26 > 2012 +0000 > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_guest.c Fri Feb 03 16:28:58 > 2012 > +0100 > @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ int guest_iommu_set_base(struct domain * > struct guest_iommu *iommu = domain_iommu(d); > > if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) || !iommu_enabled || !iommuv2_enabled ) > - return 0; > + return -EACCES; But as indicated before, all three checks above are redundant with the one check below. Hence I suggested to remove the checks above, and if you wish put an ASSERT() past the !iommu check below. Jan > > if ( !iommu ) > return -EACCES; > @@ -896,9 +896,6 @@ void guest_iommu_destroy(struct domain * > { > struct guest_iommu *iommu; > > - if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) || !iommu_enabled || !iommuv2_enabled ) > - return; > - > iommu = domain_iommu(d); > if ( !iommu ) > return; _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |