[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 11831: regressions - FAIL

To: <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:55:43 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:56:19 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

>>> On 03.02.12 at 07:22, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
>  build-i386                    4 xen-build                    fail   like 
> 11637
>  build-i386-oldkern            4 xen-build                    fail   like 
> 11637

Is that really the way things should work?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 11831: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Ian Jackson

References:
- [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 11831: regressions - FAIL
  - From: xen . org

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] blkif.h: Document protocol and existing extensions
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V4 02/13] netback: add module unload function.
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 11831: regressions - FAIL
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 11831: regressions - FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.