[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] vMCE vs migration

To: "Jinsong Liu" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:08:51 +0000
Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Haitao Shan <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Donald D Dugger <donald.d.dugger@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:09:22 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

>>> On 03.02.12 at 08:18, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How about use static bank size, say 256, which architecture (IA32_MCG_CAP 
> MSR) defined max bank number?

The maximum, if any, is 32 (beyond which collision with other defined
MSRs would arise). But with the possibility of having a discontiguous
or relocated MSR space, I don't think any static maximum would be a
good idea.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] vMCE vs migration
  - From: Liu, Jinsong

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] vMCE vs migration
  - From: Liu, Jinsong

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V4 02/13] netback: add module unload function.
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [linux test] 11850: tolerable FAIL
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] vMCE vs migration
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] vMCE vs migration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.