[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Help needed debugging "EPT Misconfiguration" exception on Intel CPU
At 17:08 +0000 on 26 Jan (1327597687), Kalev, Leonid wrote: > (XEN) EPT Misconfiguration, gpa=00000000feffe000 > (XEN) domain->...->eptp = 0x431b3d01e > (XEN) vmread(EPT_POINTER) = 0x431b3d01e > > EPTP bits: > 0-2 = 6; mem type (0 = UC, 6=WB, all other = invalid) > 5-3 = 3 (should be = 3 (walk length - 1)) > 6-11 = 0 reserved > 12-39 = 0x431b3d; addr of EPT PML4 > 40-64 = 0 ; reserved (40 is the addr sz of the CPU here, may vary on > other CPUs, > max=48) > > (XEN) p2m-ept.c:649:d3 Walking EPT tables for domain 3 gfn feffe > (XEN) p2m-ept.c:668:d3 epte 1c00000431b3c007 > 0-2 = 7: access allowed: rwx > 3-7 = 0: reserved > 8-11 = 0: ignored > x-12 = 431b3c: address of > next level EPT > 51-x - 0 > 52-63 - ignored > (XEN) p2m-ept.c:668:d3 epte 1c000004374fb007 > (XEN) p2m-ept.c:668:d3 epte 1c000004374fa007 > (XEN) p2m-ept.c:668:d3 epte 1c10000c213ee037 0-2 = 7: rwx > 10000000000 (nb: addr size limit - 40 > bits for > this CPU, we're way below) > 3-5 = 6: type (0 = UC; 1 = > WC; 4 = WT; > 5 = WP; 6 = WB) > 6 = 0: > 7-11 =0: (ignored) > mfn=c213ee, (looks valid, mem extends from 100000 > to > c40000, see mem map below) > 52=1; 52-63 should be ignored Yeah, those entries look fine. Certainly they don't have any of the problems listed in section 25.2.3.1 of the SDM under "EPT Misconfigurations", so I suspect there must be something odd about the non-production CPU you're using. Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |